header-logo header-logo

Harkins loses ‘final appeal’

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Phillip Harkins, who is accused of committing a fatal gun robbery in Florida in 1999 when he was 20 years old, has lost his final appeal in one of the UK’s longest-running extradition battles.

Harkins has always denied being involved in the shooting of Joshua Hayes. After being released on bail and returning to the UK in 2002, he was convicted and imprisoned for dangerous driving that resulted in a woman’s death in a car crash. The US authorities then sought his extradition for the murder of Hayes, leading to an unprecedented legal battle that went to the European Court of Human Rights twice. The court ruled this week that Harkins’s Art 3 rights would not be breached if he was imprisoned for life without parole.

Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh, solicitor, Corker Binning, said: ‘Mr Harkins has reached a point, after 14 years, where the legal avenues available to him have been exhausted.

‘Unless he or his legal team can find cogent and compelling new evidence with which to launch a fresh challenge, this will bring to an end one of the longest extradition battles in UK history, and Mr Harkins will be put on a plane back to the US.

‘The decision regarding the inadmissibility of Mr Harkins’ claim does not in itself come as a surprise. The court will only hear the same appeal again if different grounds are relied upon, or if new evidence can substantiate an existing ground in a way which is materially different to previous attempts.’

Reece-Greenhalgh said the court had noted that there is a system in Florida whereby clemency can be granted. In a separate case, Vinter & Ors v UK, in 2013, the court decided that in order for a life sentence not to constitute inhuman and degrading treatment, it must include at least the possibility of review and release.

Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll