header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Have you herd?

nlj_7703_briggs

Has the High Court clarified the law of cattle trespass, asks Aidan Briggs

  • The unusual facts of Re Jenkins give rise to several points of interest to those with agricultural clients that have remained unclear for some time.

In Re Jenkins [2016] EWHC 426 (Ch), the court was asked to consider a claim for trespass by the personal representatives of Kenneth and Constance Jenkins against their son Michael Jenkins. The claim concerned Mr Jenkins’s occupation of nearly 450 acres of land on the Isle of Wight.

Mr Jenkins originally sought to claim an interest in the farm, either by proprietary estoppel or as a tenant under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. After litigation lasting six years, both claims were dismissed and an inquiry was ordered into damages for trespass and/or mesne profits in respect of Mr Jenkins’s occupation of the farm since his parents’ deaths.

Interestingly, Mr Jenkins kept not only his own cattle on the land, but also cattle which were bequeathed to his brother Richard under his mother’s will. These came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll