header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 June 2016 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Have you herd?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7703_briggs

Has the High Court clarified the law of cattle trespass, asks Aidan Briggs

  • The unusual facts of Re Jenkins give rise to several points of interest to those with agricultural clients that have remained unclear for some time.

In Re Jenkins [2016] EWHC 426 (Ch), the court was asked to consider a claim for trespass by the personal representatives of Kenneth and Constance Jenkins against their son Michael Jenkins. The claim concerned Mr Jenkins’s occupation of nearly 450 acres of land on the Isle of Wight.

Mr Jenkins originally sought to claim an interest in the farm, either by proprietary estoppel or as a tenant under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. After litigation lasting six years, both claims were dismissed and an inquiry was ordered into damages for trespass and/or mesne profits in respect of Mr Jenkins’s occupation of the farm since his parents’ deaths.

Interestingly, Mr Jenkins kept not only his own cattle on the land, but also cattle which were bequeathed to his brother Richard under his mother’s will. These came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll