header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Have you herd?

nlj_7703_briggs

Has the High Court clarified the law of cattle trespass, asks Aidan Briggs

  • The unusual facts of Re Jenkins give rise to several points of interest to those with agricultural clients that have remained unclear for some time.

In Re Jenkins [2016] EWHC 426 (Ch), the court was asked to consider a claim for trespass by the personal representatives of Kenneth and Constance Jenkins against their son Michael Jenkins. The claim concerned Mr Jenkins’s occupation of nearly 450 acres of land on the Isle of Wight.

Mr Jenkins originally sought to claim an interest in the farm, either by proprietary estoppel or as a tenant under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. After litigation lasting six years, both claims were dismissed and an inquiry was ordered into damages for trespass and/or mesne profits in respect of Mr Jenkins’s occupation of the farm since his parents’ deaths.

Interestingly, Mr Jenkins kept not only his own cattle on the land, but also cattle which were bequeathed to his brother Richard under his mother’s will. These came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll