header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / Jeffrey T Shapiro
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Help is out there

nlj_7671_t-shapiro

Jeffrey T Shapiro examines what support is available to assist litigators to satisfy the increased focus on early settlement & costs control

The new Practice Direction on pre-action conduct and protocols (PDPACP) came into force on 6 April 2015. Pre-action behaviour now directly supports the overriding objective to enable “the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost” (CPR 1.1(1)). Under the PDPACP, “the court expects the parties to have exchanged sufficient information before commencing proceedings: (1) to understand each other’s position and make decisions on how to proceed; (2) to try to settle without proceedings or consider Alternative Dispute Resolution; and, (3) where proceedings are necessary, to enable efficient management at a proportionate and reduced cost” (PDPACP 3).

While the objectives of the PDPACP and CPR now align, the data-driven realities of our modern world are at odds with the need to get to the facts quickly at reduced cost. With the Jackson Reforms, the government instituted a menu of disclosure options when formal proceedings commence to help reduce

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll