header-logo header-logo

Hidden perils

24 May 2012 / Paul Denholm
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Paul Denholm questions the application of LA 2011 to planning breaches

Much has already been said about the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011), which applies to England and came into force in April.

There has been little exposure, however, to how it might impact buyers of residential properties where a planning breach may have occurred. The story starts with two high profile cases that have hit the pages of the national media.

A man’s home is his castle

First, there was Robert Fidler and his wife Linda who, in 2002, built a mock Tudor castle in Surrey. Lacking the relevant planning permission, they hid the castle behind a 40 feet high pile of straw bales. After they had lived there for more than four years, the bales were removed—and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council brought enforcement proceedings against them for breach of planning control. Section 171B of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) renders development immune from enforcement if building works were substantially completed more than four years previously.

However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll