header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012 / Paul Denholm
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Hidden perils

Paul Denholm questions the application of LA 2011 to planning breaches

Much has already been said about the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011), which applies to England and came into force in April.

There has been little exposure, however, to how it might impact buyers of residential properties where a planning breach may have occurred. The story starts with two high profile cases that have hit the pages of the national media.

A man’s home is his castle

First, there was Robert Fidler and his wife Linda who, in 2002, built a mock Tudor castle in Surrey. Lacking the relevant planning permission, they hid the castle behind a 40 feet high pile of straw bales. After they had lived there for more than four years, the bales were removed—and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council brought enforcement proceedings against them for breach of planning control. Section 171B of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) renders development immune from enforcement if building works were substantially completed more than four years previously.

However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll