header-logo header-logo

A hidden trap?

02 August 2007 / C I Howells
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

What happens when there is not enough money to satisfy legacies and devise? C I Howells reports

One of the most common tasks for any private client solicitor is to advise a testator who wishes to provide for: (i) his wife or partner; and (ii) his children, or other beneficiaries. Everyone wishes to pay as little inheritance tax (IHT) as possible.

For the purposes of this article, I shall assume that the particular case is one where the total estate is likely to exceed the “nil-rate band” (NRB), currently £300,000: see the Finance Act 2005, s 98. Past experience indicates that the figure is subject to annual increase.

Probably the commonest solution is for the will to provide for the children or other beneficiaries to be given “the maximum amount of cash which I can give without incurring any liability to Inheritance Tax” (or similar words), ie the NRB, and for the wife or partner to be given the residuary estate—probably including the testator’s estate or interest in the matrimonial or quasi-matrimonial home.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll