header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / C I Howells
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

A hidden trap?

What happens when there is not enough money to satisfy legacies and devise? C I Howells reports

One of the most common tasks for any private client solicitor is to advise a testator who wishes to provide for: (i) his wife or partner; and (ii) his children, or other beneficiaries. Everyone wishes to pay as little inheritance tax (IHT) as possible.

For the purposes of this article, I shall assume that the particular case is one where the total estate is likely to exceed the “nil-rate band” (NRB), currently £300,000: see the Finance Act 2005, s 98. Past experience indicates that the figure is subject to annual increase.

Probably the commonest solution is for the will to provide for the children or other beneficiaries to be given “the maximum amount of cash which I can give without incurring any liability to Inheritance Tax” (or similar words), ie the NRB, and for the wife or partner to be given the residuary estate—probably including the testator’s estate or interest in the matrimonial or quasi-matrimonial home.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll