header-logo header-logo

Hierarchies, sexual harassment & bullying

08 July 2020 / Kevin Charles
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Opinion , Data protection , Human rights , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
23807
Kevin Charles explains why it’s time for structural change to resolve bullying & harassment issues in the legal profession

Some 20 years ago, during my pupillage days, as the clock struck 4pm, every day we were required to stop whatever we were doing and round up members of chambers to serve tea in the library. We stood like centurion guards along the back wall and while serving tea we were not required to speak unless spoken to and any response we gave had to be considered, erudite and massage the ego of the person asking. The competition among pupils was high and the need to stand out and impress was even higher. Our position within the pecking order was reinforced and made perfectly clear—we were firmly at the bottom, and those in senior positions, who were feted, lionised and seemingly untouchable, held our legal careers in their hands, holding dream tickets to tenancy, employment references and valuable contacts.

The idea that all those years ago, a pupil or indeed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll