header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 November 2012 / Piya Muqit
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Human rights
printer mail-detail

High & dry

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Survivors of torture will suffer further due to legal aid cuts, says Piya Muqit

The £350m cuts to legal aid, which are due to come into effect on 1 April 2013, will restrict access to justice for one of the most vulnerable groups of people in this country.

LASPO’s impact

Torture survivors seeking or granted refuge in the UK are already struggling to secure decent legal representation, and radical changes to the legal aid system following the passing of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 mean this situation will worsen considerably in 2013.

The Act will, with limited exceptions, remove or reduce legal aid funding for advice on immigration, welfare benefits, housing, family, debt, and employment, all of which affect Freedom from Torture’s clients.

While free advice and representation on asylum claims will still be available, we fear that the removal of legal aid for most immigration matters will be the last straw for many providers who are already struggling to sustain viable legal aid practices in the asylum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll