header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

High & dry

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
30 November 2012 / Piya Muqit
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Survivors of torture will suffer further due to legal aid cuts, says Piya Muqit

The £350m cuts to legal aid, which are due to come into effect on 1 April 2013, will restrict access to justice for one of the most vulnerable groups of people in this country.

LASPO’s impact

Torture survivors seeking or granted refuge in the UK are already struggling to secure decent legal representation, and radical changes to the legal aid system following the passing of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 mean this situation will worsen considerably in 2013.

The Act will, with limited exceptions, remove or reduce legal aid funding for advice on immigration, welfare benefits, housing, family, debt, and employment, all of which affect Freedom from Torture’s clients.

While free advice and representation on asylum claims will still be available, we fear that the removal of legal aid for most immigration matters will be the last straw for many providers who are already struggling to sustain viable legal aid practices in the asylum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll