header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014 / Meghann McTague
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

High & dry

Meghann McTague asks, when is an accident really an accident?

In Ford v Malaysian Airline Systems Berhad [2013] EWCA Civ 1163, [2013] All ER (D) 236 (Sep), Ms Ford was a passenger on an international flight from London Heathrow to Melbourne via Kuala Lumpur. She had, as a result of her previous medical history, been prone to bouts of cystitis. The extent of her previous treatment had been to purchase over the counter medication in respect of it.

While on board, the appellant realised that she was having difficulty in urinating and asked the cabin crew whether they had any bicarbonate of soda or cranberry juice. Unfortunately, neither was available; however the crew were aware that one of their first class passengers was a doctor.

Examination

The doctor agreed to examine the appellant and the appellant consented to this without further enquiry as to what the nature of the doctor’s qualifications or experience was.

The doctor suggested to the appellant that she have an injection of a diuretic to enable her to urinate. The appellant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll