header-logo header-logo

High & dry

07 February 2014 / Meghann McTague
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Meghann McTague asks, when is an accident really an accident?

In Ford v Malaysian Airline Systems Berhad [2013] EWCA Civ 1163, [2013] All ER (D) 236 (Sep), Ms Ford was a passenger on an international flight from London Heathrow to Melbourne via Kuala Lumpur. She had, as a result of her previous medical history, been prone to bouts of cystitis. The extent of her previous treatment had been to purchase over the counter medication in respect of it.

While on board, the appellant realised that she was having difficulty in urinating and asked the cabin crew whether they had any bicarbonate of soda or cranberry juice. Unfortunately, neither was available; however the crew were aware that one of their first class passengers was a doctor.

Examination

The doctor agreed to examine the appellant and the appellant consented to this without further enquiry as to what the nature of the doctor’s qualifications or experience was.

The doctor suggested to the appellant that she have an injection of a diuretic to enable her to urinate. The appellant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll