header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

HIGHER RIGHTS

In brief

A consultation on whether solicitors need a separate qualification before being able to appear in the higher courts has been launched by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). At present more than 3,600 solicitors hold a higher courts qualification. Peter Williamson, chair of the SRA, says: “We are asking whether the current restrictions are justified in the interests of the public or the proper administration of justice. Obviously there are many interested parties, including the judiciary, the profession and their clients, so we hope they will all let us know their views.” The consultation is at www.higher-rights.org.uk and runs until 12 April 2007. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll