header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

HIGHER RIGHTS

In brief

A consultation on whether solicitors need a separate qualification before being able to appear in the higher courts has been launched by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). At present more than 3,600 solicitors hold a higher courts qualification. Peter Williamson, chair of the SRA, says: “We are asking whether the current restrictions are justified in the interests of the public or the proper administration of justice. Obviously there are many interested parties, including the judiciary, the profession and their clients, so we hope they will all let us know their views.” The consultation is at www.higher-rights.org.uk and runs until 12 April 2007. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll