header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Highways

Ali v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1282, [2010] All ER (D) 193 (Nov)

Section 130 of the Highways Act 1980 was concerned with the protection of the legal rights of the public at large. The rights in question were the rights of the general public to use the public highway. The section related to legal rights of access, not the safety of the highway. It placed no express obligation on the highway authority to remove obstructions, and there was no justification for the implication of such an obligation, especially since express provision was made about the duty of a highway authority to remove obstructions in s 150.

Section 263(1) provided for the vesting of public highways in the highway authority, but the legal interest thereby created was an unusual and limited one. A highway authority was not an occupier of the highway and did not owe to highway users a common law duty of care. Sections 149 and 150 regulated the powers and duties of highway authorities with respect to the removal of highway

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll