header-logo header-logo

HMP Wandsworth: Illegal conditions?

23 February 2024 / Steve Foster
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail
160017
Conditions at HMP Wandsworth are ‘unsafe’ and ‘inhuman’, says a recent report. But are they in breach of the ECHR, Art 3? Steve Foster considers the evidence
  • Examines the findings of the Independent Monitoring Board report into conditions at HMP Wandsworth, and considers them in relation to the guarantees of the European Convention on Human Rights, Art 3 and case law.

A recent report published by the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) of HMP Wandsworth has highlighted concerns regarding the safety and integrity of prisoners and prison staff at the prison (‘Unsafe and inhuman conditions at Wandsworth’, 11 October 2023). It states that conditions at the prison reflect the failures of the prison system as a whole, and that there had been no real progress in resolving problems at Wandsworth, caused by years of underinvestment in the fabric, facilities and staff at the prison.

But are these conditions in breach of the law, and in particular Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees freedom from inhuman and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll