header-logo header-logo

Holiday abductions: far from home

22 July 2022 / Mani Singh Basi
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
88158
How should a left behind parent proceed when their child is wrongfully retained abroad? Mani Singh Basi reports
  • Wrongful retention of children under the 1980 Hague Convention: the options available to the parent left behind.
  • The inherent jurisdiction of the courts of England & Wales when a child is retained in a country which is not a signatory to the Hague Convention.

In the field of family law, there are unfortunately circumstances when a parent either takes a child from or does not return a child to their home country. Taking an example, a child’s mother and father may have an informal arrangement for contact. It may have been envisaged that one of the parents would take the child for a holiday from England to another country for three weeks during the summer holidays and this pattern may have occurred in the past, on each occasion the travelling parent returning with the child. On the next occasion, the travelling parent may not return with the child and may indicate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll