header-logo header-logo

22 July 2022 / Mani Singh Basi
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Holiday abductions: far from home

88158
How should a left behind parent proceed when their child is wrongfully retained abroad? Mani Singh Basi reports
  • Wrongful retention of children under the 1980 Hague Convention: the options available to the parent left behind.
  • The inherent jurisdiction of the courts of England & Wales when a child is retained in a country which is not a signatory to the Hague Convention.

In the field of family law, there are unfortunately circumstances when a parent either takes a child from or does not return a child to their home country. Taking an example, a child’s mother and father may have an informal arrangement for contact. It may have been envisaged that one of the parents would take the child for a holiday from England to another country for three weeks during the summer holidays and this pattern may have occurred in the past, on each occasion the travelling parent returning with the child. On the next occasion, the travelling parent may not return with the child and may indicate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll