header-logo header-logo

17 August 2016 / León Fernando Del Canto
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , EU , Property
printer mail-detail

Holiday hell

nlj_7717_delcanto

An unexpected European decision is bad news for Spanish holiday homeowners, says León Fernando Del Canto

  • Advocate General’s opinion that the temporal limit on the effects of the invalidity of “floor” clauses included in mortgage loan agreements in Spain is compatible with EU law is bad news for Spanish homeowners.

On 13 July the Advocate General gave a surprising opinion that the temporal limit on the effects of the invalidity of “floor” clauses included in mortgage loan agreements in Spain is compatible with EU law (see the Joint Cases of C-154/15 Francisco Gutiérrez Naranjo v Cajasur Banco S.A.U., C-307/15 Ana María Palacios Martínez v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA and C-308/15 Banco Popular Español SA v Emilio Irles López and Teresa Torres Andreu).

These clauses, which were used by the majority of banks in Spain, control the amount of interest being paid on a mortgage. This means that if the interest rate falls below the “floor”, as defined in the agreement, the consumer must still pay the set interest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll