header-logo header-logo

Home Office drops police registration scheme for migrants

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
The police registration scheme, which required certain visa holders to register with the police, has been suspended with immediate effect

The Home Office announced the decision with no prior notice on 4 August. Those with existing appointments, where they would have attended the police station in person to have their documents checked, will no longer need to attend.

A note from the Home Office to be circulated to constabularies said: ‘We are abolishing the requirement to register with the police as the police registration scheme in its current form is outdated and no longer provides any public protection benefit to either the Home Office or the police.

‘The data a migrant provides to the police on registration is already captured by the Home Office at the visa application stage, and is available to the police on request via Immigration Enforcement, so there is no need for it to be provided twice.’

The note advised that ‘migrants who have been issued with a visa with the requirement to register on it do not need to go to a police station to register’, and those who have previously registered with the police do not need to do anything.

Joanna Hunt, head of immigration at Fieldfisher, said: ‘The fact that the government has finally decided to drop the requirement for certain visa holders to register their status and address with the police is great news and a step in the right direction for making the UK a more welcoming place.

‘The Home Office keep their own records on migrants in the UK so the records that the police held were largely redundant. What they did serve to do was alienate and discriminate against those nationalities who had to register, thus tainting them with the appearance of criminality.

‘Registering with the police therefore played a role in creating a hostile and unwelcoming environment for foreign migrants and it is for this reason it's (quiet!) suspension is good news indeed.’
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll