header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Rebecca Dziobon
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Home sweet home

Rebecca Dziobon delves into retention of jurisdiction in cases extending overseas

In Re I (A Child) [2009] UKSC 10, [2009] All ER (D) 12 (Dec) the child in question was aged nine. He was born in this country and is a British citizen. His mother originates from India and has lived here for many years. His father originates from Pakistan and now lives here. Both are British citizens. They were married in 1999 in Pakistan but then lived here until they separated in 2002 and divorced in 2003. No orders were made about their child during the course of the divorce proceedings.

Case history

Care proceedings

The child had been the subject of concluded care proceedings from 2002 to 2003. At a fact-finding hearing, the father was found to have caused non-accidental injuries to the child. However, at a later welfare hearing, the mother was found to have been responsible. At the final hearing, District Judge Brasse ordered that the child should live with his father and have supervised contact with his mother in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll