header-logo header-logo

24 March 2026
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Legal News , Miscarriage of justice
printer mail-detail

Hope on the Post Office IT Horizon?

A flat-rate, ‘events-based’ redress scheme for families of postmasters severely affected by the Horizon IT miscarriage of justice scandal is due to open in the summer

The scheme was recommended by Sir Wyn Williams, who chaired the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. Applicants must show their postmaster relative suffered prosecution, bankruptcy or other consequence of the faulty software but will not need to provide contemporaneous evidence of medical issues, which few people would be able to provide. The amount to be awarded has not been decided.

Post Office minister Blair McDougall said: ‘The scandal’s devastating consequences were experienced not just by those running post offices, but also by those closest to them.

‘The scheme has been designed to be as accessible and straightforward as possible, minimising bureaucratic barriers so that families receive redress without delay.’

Issue: 8155 / Categories: Legal News , Miscarriage of justice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll