Reforming the House of Lords: a constitutional quagmire? By Mark Ryan
Jack Straw the secretary of state for justice and lord chancellor, announced the publication of the long-awaited government white paper on reform of the House of Lords (An Elected Second Chamber: Further Reform of the House of Lords, Cm 7438) on 14 July 2008. This paper followed the parliamentary votes in March 2007 on the future composition of a fully reformed second chamber, which had been triggered by an earlier white paper (The House of Lords: Reform Cm 7027). In these votes the House of Commons voted to remove the remaining hereditary peers, as well as simultaneously voting for both the options of a wholly elected and an 80% elected House. The House of Lords voted overwhelmingly, rather unsurprisingly, to approve a fully appointed House. These votes led to the resumption of crossparty talks chaired by Straw who envisaged that a further white paper would be published around the turn of the year.
Composition
The 2008 white paper puts forward only two
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=77dbbdb7_1)
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b3bea7f_1)
