header-logo header-logo

Housing

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Powell v London Borough of Hounslow [2011] UKSC 8, [2011] All ER (D) 255 (Feb)

(1) A court would only have to consider whether the making of a possession order was proportionate for the purposes of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights if the issue had been raised by the occupier and it had crossed the high threshold of being seriously arguable. That threshold would be crossed in only a small number of cases. The question then would be whether making an order for the occupier’s eviction was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

(2) Section 127(1) of the Housing Act 1996 Act provided that the landlord might only bring an introductory tenancy to an end by obtaining an order for possession. On the face of it, the court had no discretion under s 127(2) of the 1996 Act as to whether or not it should make the order for possession. Given that lawfulness was an inherent requirement of the procedure for seeking a possession order, it was open to the court to consider whether the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll