header-logo header-logo

Housing

01 March 2013
Issue: 7550 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sharif v Camden London Borough [2013] UKSC 10, [2013] All ER (D) 229 (Feb)

The word “accommodation” in the Housing Act 1996, in itself, was neutral. It was not, in its ordinary sense, to be equated with “unit of accommodation”. It was no abuse of language to speak of a family being “accommodated” in two adjoining flats. The limitation, if any, had to be found in the words “available for occupation...together with” the other members of his family. The statutory test would be satisfied by a single unit of accommodation in which a family could live together. However, it might also be satisfied by two units of accommodation, if they were so located that they enabled the family to live “together” in practical terms. Accommodation, whether in one unit or two, would not be “suitable” unless it enabled the fundamental objective of the Act, which was to ensure that families could “live together”, to be achieved.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll