header-logo header-logo

Housing—Local authority houses—Security of tenure

03 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2012] UKSC 39

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 25 July 2012

The appellant was not entitled to succeed as the secure tenant of a local authority property, in circumstances where the property had been let to her parents, the father had left and the mother had subsequently died. The property went to the father and, as he was not residing there, the authority was entitled to possession.

Jan Luba QC and Nicholas Nicol (instructed by Quality Solicitors Evans Derry) for the appellant. Bryan McGuire QC and Catherine Rowlands (instructed by Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Legal Services) for the authority.

The parents became joint tenants of a three bedroom house in 1967. The freehold ownership was transferred to the respondent local authority in September 1980. On 3 October 1980, Pt II of the Housing Act 1980 (HA 1980) came into force and the tenancy became a secure tenancy. The parents lived together

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll