header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Housing—Local authority houses—Security of tenure

Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2012] UKSC 39

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 25 July 2012

The appellant was not entitled to succeed as the secure tenant of a local authority property, in circumstances where the property had been let to her parents, the father had left and the mother had subsequently died. The property went to the father and, as he was not residing there, the authority was entitled to possession.

Jan Luba QC and Nicholas Nicol (instructed by Quality Solicitors Evans Derry) for the appellant. Bryan McGuire QC and Catherine Rowlands (instructed by Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Legal Services) for the authority.

The parents became joint tenants of a three bedroom house in 1967. The freehold ownership was transferred to the respondent local authority in September 1980. On 3 October 1980, Pt II of the Housing Act 1980 (HA 1980) came into force and the tenancy became a secure tenancy. The parents lived together

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll