header-logo header-logo

How high a hurdle?

01 February 2013 / Tim Kerr , Charles Banner
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
hires_7_3

What standard of proof must the SDT apply to allegations of solicitors’ misconduct, ask Tim Kerr QC & Charles Banner

Under r 7.7 of the Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2011, where the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) makes a disciplinary decision itself without referring the matter to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT), the civil standard is expressly applied. The rules are silent, however, as to the applicable standard in cases referred to the SDT. This contrasts with the rules governing proceedings before the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal, which specify that the criminal standard of proof is to be applied (see reg 11 of the Disciplinary Tribunals Regulations 2009). In the absence of statutory provision for the SDT, it is for the common law to determine the applicable standard.

This issue was raised, but not decided, in Richards v The Law Society [2009] EWHC 2087 (Admin). In that case, the Law Society maintained that the criminal standard applied, while the SRA contended for the civil standard. Sir Anthony May held that the issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll