header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 July 2018 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

How ‘Honourable’ are High Court judges?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7803_zellick

Professor Graham Zellick QC unravels the mysteries of parallel, non-optional & post-retirement titles

  • May High Court judges attach the prefix ‘The Honourable’ to their non-judicial title?
  • May retired High Court judges use the prefix ‘The Honourable’?
  • Should any of the current rules be changed?

Puisne judges of the High Court—all justices of the High Court other than the heads of division—have the official title or style of ‘The Honourable Mr/Mrs/Ms Justice Smith’, with forename included only if there is already a judge with that or a similar surname so as to avoid confusion. Although no one seems to know the origin of or authority for this style of address, it is long-established, universally recognised and not disputed.

Also, High Court judges are knighted on appointment or, if a woman, appointed Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE). Men are made Knights Bachelor, but as there is no direct female equivalent, women become DBEs. (The male equivalent of DBE is KBE (Knight Commander),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll