header-logo header-logo

How ‘public’ are public inquiries?

14 May 2021 / Helen Stone, Hickman & Rose , Eleanor Cornish
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Covid-19 , Inquests
printer mail-detail
48968
Accessibility & accountability in inquiries must remain paramount despite the demands of COVID measures, argue Helen Stone & Eleanor Cornish

Public inquiries are a crucial element of the UK’s democratic system. By establishing the facts about a scandal or large-scale tragedy, they enable a wide range of institutions and individuals to be held publicly accountable. Wrongdoing is exposed, lessons are learnt, and the public’s confidence is rebuilt as the institutions (hopefully) evolve.

While they can take different forms, the most rigorous and independent inquiries are those held under the Inquiries Act 2005 (IA 2005). The importance of public access to such inquiries (and the information disclosed to them) is enshrined in IA 2005, s 18, with the default position being that individuals can attend—and see and hear—a simultaneous transmission of proceedings, unless a restriction notice or order is imposed.

IA 2005, s 19 empowers the inquiry chair to impose these restrictions. However, any such restriction must be only those required by, for example, statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll