header-logo header-logo

How to talk with children

14 October 2022 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Divorce
printer mail-detail
97407
Caroline Bowden offers tools & insight to help family law professionals speak with children
  • Gauging personality, character and world view of children, and why this can help meaningful communications between family law professionals and children affected by legal proceedings or family crisis.

While many mediators talk directly to children, family lawyers also talk to their parent clients about how the children are coping during the time of separation or other family crisis. We can all do better at focusing on the differences between each child’s wish or ability to express themselves regarding the most difficult issues in their lives.

When I joined the Children Panel in 2000, CAFCASS as a service was not yet fully formed, while many who were independent Guardians were deciding to leave. This meant that, as a newly minted child care solicitor, I was left interviewing children on my own on a couple of memorable cases. This was extremely unnerving; I felt untrained and ill-prepared.

However, who ever feels fully prepared to talk to children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll