header-logo header-logo

The human condition

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New commission to investigate UK Bill of Rights

Lord Lester and Helena Kennedy QC are among eight human rights experts appointed to a commission to investigate the case for a UK Bill of Rights.
The commission, due to file its final report and recommendations by the end of 2012, will be chaired by former permanent secretary, Sir Leigh Lewis. Its members include Sir David Edward PC QC, a former judge of the European Court of Justice, and Professor Philippe Sands QC.

Launching the commission this week, Ken Clarke, secretary of state for justice, said: “I hope that this work will help to inform the debate on human rights at home and assist us as we continue to press for reform of the Strasbourg Court.”

The Ministry of Justice said the independent commission would investigate the creation of a UK Bill of Rights that “incorporates and builds on all our obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, ensures that these rights continue to be enshrined in UK law, and protects and extends our liberties”. It will advise the government on potential reform of the European Court of Human Rights in the run-up to the UK’s chairmanship of the Council of Europe later this year.

Sir Leigh Lewis, says: “I hope that the commission’s final report will provide an objective and informed basis for the future debate on human rights in the UK.”

Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC, chairman of the board, British Institute of Human Rights, said: “We note that any Bill of Rights recommended by the government’s Commission is required to build on all our obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights and ensure that these rights continue to be enshrined in UK law.

“However, we are concerned that the terms of reference make no reference to the Human Rights Act. We call on the new commission, as a matter of urgency, to confirm that it will ensure any proposal for a Bill of Rights builds on the Human Rights Act, and is designed to enhance, rather than weaken, the protections and mechanisms already in place.

“Such an assurance would increase the prospect of a genuine and open debate about the legal protection of human rights in the UK.”

Human rights group, Justice predicted last year, in the report Devolution and Human Rights, that any attempt to substantially amend the Act would likely “prove a legal and political nightmare”.
 

Issue: 7458 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll