header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008 / Neil Allen
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law , Mental health
printer mail-detail

A human right to smoke?

Has the government struck the right balance between the freedom of smokers and the welfare of non-smokers? Neil Allen reports

Our freedom to choose when and where to smoke is now regulated by the Health Act 2006 and its accompanying regulations which, broadly speaking, ban smoking in enclosed public places and work premises. Smoking in one's own home is not forbidden. Other types of accommodation, such as prisons, care homes and hospices, are similarly exempted from the prohibition. Hospitals are not, so patients must brave the weather if they wish to smoke. However, that is not an option for many patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983.

The government originally intended to exempt designated smoking rooms in mental health units providing long-term residential accommodation. However, the public's response to its consultation opposed such a move. As a result, and unlike the position in Ireland and Scotland, reg 10(3) of the Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007 merely provides a 12-month “sunset clause” to the ban. From 1 July

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll