header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008 / Neil Allen
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law , Mental health
printer mail-detail

A human right to smoke?

Has the government struck the right balance between the freedom of smokers and the welfare of non-smokers? Neil Allen reports

Our freedom to choose when and where to smoke is now regulated by the Health Act 2006 and its accompanying regulations which, broadly speaking, ban smoking in enclosed public places and work premises. Smoking in one's own home is not forbidden. Other types of accommodation, such as prisons, care homes and hospices, are similarly exempted from the prohibition. Hospitals are not, so patients must brave the weather if they wish to smoke. However, that is not an option for many patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983.

The government originally intended to exempt designated smoking rooms in mental health units providing long-term residential accommodation. However, the public's response to its consultation opposed such a move. As a result, and unlike the position in Ireland and Scotland, reg 10(3) of the Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007 merely provides a 12-month “sunset clause” to the ban. From 1 July

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll