header-logo header-logo

Human Rights

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Oct)

Within the autonomous meaning afforded to “civil rights” by the European Court of Human Rights, a prisoner’s right of association with his fellow inmates was a civil right subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the prison governor. The extent of the ‘basic’ association to which the inmate would be entitled was, subject to the performance of the Secretary of State’s statutory duty, in the discretion of the governor of the institution, but the existence of that discretion did not remove from association its quality as a personal right.  Further, a prisoner’s rights under Arts 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights would not be engaged by disciplinary proceedings before a prison governor unless the punishment imposed reached a certain level of seriousness.  
 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll