header-logo header-logo

Human Rights

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Oct)

Within the autonomous meaning afforded to “civil rights” by the European Court of Human Rights, a prisoner’s right of association with his fellow inmates was a civil right subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the prison governor. The extent of the ‘basic’ association to which the inmate would be entitled was, subject to the performance of the Secretary of State’s statutory duty, in the discretion of the governor of the institution, but the existence of that discretion did not remove from association its quality as a personal right.  Further, a prisoner’s rights under Arts 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights would not be engaged by disciplinary proceedings before a prison governor unless the punishment imposed reached a certain level of seriousness.  
 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll