header-logo header-logo

07 May 2010
Issue: 7416 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human rights

Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWHC 865 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 196 (Apr)

There were two stages in the test defining the duty of the state under Art 2 to take steps to prevent persons killing themselves, specifically in the context of a detained patient in a mental hospital. The first was to decide whether the defendant had the requisite knowledge, actual or constructive, of a “real and immediate risk to life” from self harm. The second was whether the defendant failed to do all that could reasonably have been expected of it to avoid or prevent that risk.

The test depended not only on what the relevant authority had known but also what it ought to have known. The relevant knowledge was what they had known or ought to have known at the time and the court would have to warn itself against the dangers of hindsight. The authorities were clear that there was a high threshold to be crossed before the test was satisfied. The threshold that the claimant would have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll