header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights

Ashendon and another v United Kingdom (App Nos 35730/07 & 4285/08), [2011] All ER (D) 81 (Sep)

The presumption of innocence enshrined in Art 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) was one of the elements of a fair criminal trial required by Art 6(1). It would be violated if a statement of a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflected an opinion that he was guilty unless he had been proved so according to law. It sufficed, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there had been some reasoning to suggest that the official regards that person as guilty.

However, neither Art 6(2) nor any other provision of the Convention gave a person “charged with a criminal offence” a right to compensation for lawful detention on remand where proceedings taken against him had been discontinued. Further, the Convention would not guarantee a defendant who had been acquitted the right to reimbursement of his costs.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll