header-logo header-logo

Human rights

05 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Case law
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Youngsam) v Parole Board [2017] EWHC 729 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 86 (Apr)

The Administrative Court held that the broad principle of the majority in R (on the application of Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] 4 All ER 251 on the scope of Art 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights, while obiter, ought to be followed by inferior courts. Accordingly, Art 5(4) had no application to the claimant’s judicial review proceedings, complaining that the defendant Parole Board’s delays in holding an oral hearing concerning his release, and the delay had not breached common law duty to act within a reasonable time.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll