header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Deportation

29 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AA v United Kingdom (App No 8000/08), [2011] All ER (D) 112 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Garlicki (president), Bratza, Mijovic, Hirvela, Bianku, Kalaydjieva and Vucinic, 30 Aug 2011

Regardless of the existence or otherwise of a “family life”, the expulsion of a settled migrant constitutes an interference with his right to respect for private life, and will therefore be in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) unless it can be justified under para 2 of Art 8.

The applicant was born in Nigeria in 1986. In 2000, he arrived in the UK and was granted entry clearance to join his mother. In September 2002, when he was aged 15, he was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl and sentenced to four years in a young offender’s institution, together with registration on the sex offenders’ register. He was released after almost two years of that sentence. In July 2003, he was given indefinite leave to remain in the UK, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll