header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Deportation

AA v United Kingdom (App No 8000/08), [2011] All ER (D) 112 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Garlicki (president), Bratza, Mijovic, Hirvela, Bianku, Kalaydjieva and Vucinic, 30 Aug 2011

Regardless of the existence or otherwise of a “family life”, the expulsion of a settled migrant constitutes an interference with his right to respect for private life, and will therefore be in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) unless it can be justified under para 2 of Art 8.

The applicant was born in Nigeria in 1986. In 2000, he arrived in the UK and was granted entry clearance to join his mother. In September 2002, when he was aged 15, he was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl and sentenced to four years in a young offender’s institution, together with registration on the sex offenders’ register. He was released after almost two years of that sentence. In July 2003, he was given indefinite leave to remain in the UK, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll