header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Deportation

29 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AA v United Kingdom (App No 8000/08), [2011] All ER (D) 112 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Garlicki (president), Bratza, Mijovic, Hirvela, Bianku, Kalaydjieva and Vucinic, 30 Aug 2011

Regardless of the existence or otherwise of a “family life”, the expulsion of a settled migrant constitutes an interference with his right to respect for private life, and will therefore be in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) unless it can be justified under para 2 of Art 8.

The applicant was born in Nigeria in 1986. In 2000, he arrived in the UK and was granted entry clearance to join his mother. In September 2002, when he was aged 15, he was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl and sentenced to four years in a young offender’s institution, together with registration on the sex offenders’ register. He was released after almost two years of that sentence. In July 2003, he was given indefinite leave to remain in the UK, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll