Could reinstating the right to sue for breach of promise to marry assist couples in non-qualifying ceremony marriages?
Do we need to re-look at the abolished right to sue for breach of promise to marry?
I recently came across a tweet which referred to reforming family law by re-introducing ‘breach of promise’ as a remedy in ‘non qualifying ceremony’ cases, on protection for parties in religious marriages promised a legally binding ceremony gone unfulfilled. (Family Law Reform Now: Twitter 09/09/21 15:45.)
My legal mind, and I am sure for many family lawyers, headed straight to the case of Akhter v Khan [2018] EWFC 54. However, at the same time, I thought of friends who have previously been in committed relationships which have broken down, and at least one party felt he/she still had a choice as to whether to proceed with the civil marriage or not regardless of what might have taken place following the
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b3bea7f_1)
