header-logo header-logo

I spy with my private eye

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Extramarital affairs are up, prompting a huge rise in the use of private investigators by divorcing couples to confirm fears that their other half was cheating on them, family lawyers report.

The numbers using snoops to catch out their unfaithful spouses shot up to 49% of all divorcing couples in 2006, compared to just 18% in 2005, according to Grant Thornton Forensic and Investigation Services practice’s fourth annual survey of 100 of the UK’s leading family lawyers.

The survey showed that women were nearly twice as likely to use such a service to check up on their spouse than men—unsurprisingly, perhaps, given that in two thirds (69%) of cases it was men who played away.

According to the lawyers surveyed, the stated reason for marital breakdowns in the UK in 32% of cases was due to one partner having an affair during 2006, up from 29% in 2005 and 27% in 2004.

Behaviour was blamed for marriage breakdown in 17% of cases, followed by family strains in 8% of cases and decisions of a personal nature in 4% of instances.

Only 4% cited emotional and physical abuse as the reason for their divorce, down from 12% in 2005.
Andrea McLaren, head of Grant Thornton’s London matrimonial practice says one of the survey’s most surprising results was the fall in the number of couples who tried to hide assets from their estranged spouse. In 2006, only 10% of couples did so, down from 16% in 2005.

She says that given the House of Lords’ judgment in the Miller and McFarlane cases, this figure was expected to increase as spouses tried to keep assets out of the pot of wealth which the courts can carve up.
McLaren says that possible reasons for the decline could include the sophisticated forensic techniques now available to search for such “hidden” assets.

However, she adds that it could simply be due to the fact that women today have a stronger awareness of and involvement in their financial affairs than in the past.

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll