header-logo header-logo

“I want more”

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

I contend that a claimant on a specified claim can ask the court for more than the fixed costs on the claim form. What procedure should be adopted to facilitate this where the claimant is in a position to enter a default judgment?

CPR 45.1 makes it clear that fixed costs are what are awarded “unless the court orders otherwise”. So there is a discretion, but the court might take some persuading “otherwise”. A departure from fixed costs could be justified where there is a contractual entitlement to a costs indemnity or reasonable costs or by the complexity and volume of work generated by the case. The claim form should state that assessed costs are sought where a figure for fixed costs is solicited and a Pt 23 application notice issued with the request for judgment. Team members have made or encountered orders being made in these circumstances for up to £20,000.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll