header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Imaginary intentions?

Finding common intention after Kernott v Jones.
Michael Walsh reports

“This is a cautionary tale, which all unmarried couples who are contemplating the purchase of residential property as their home, and all solicitors who advise them, should study…” That was the opening warning given by Wall LJ in the recent case of Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA Civ 578, [2010] All ER (D) 244 (May) a case that considers the division of the beneficial interest of the home of cohabitants after a long period of separation.

Facts

In 1981 Ms Jones purchased a caravan for £3,750, which was funded by a loan from her bank. In 1983 or 1984, Mr Kernott moved in with Ms Jones and they had a child. In 1985 Ms Jones sold the caravan for £8,000 and the couple bought the freehold of the property in question for £30,000. Ms Jones contributed £6,000 from the sale of the caravan and the rest of the purchase was financed by an endowment mortgage.

During their relationship Mr Kernott would give Ms Jones £100

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson recruits regulatory experts Caroline Barker and Tom Walker to bolster health, government and corporates practices

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Partner and paralegals bolster clinical negligence team at Jackson Lees Group

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King triples Manchester footprint with office move as law firm’s rapid growth journey continues

NEWS
The Court of Appeal has overturned the convictions of five Barclays LIBOR/EURIBOR traders—demonstrating the dangers of removing jury trial from serious fraud cases, according to a solicitor acting in the case
Lawyers have welcomed the Lord Chancellor’s reverse-ferret on jury reforms, but expressed ‘serious concerns’ about the decision to exclude fraud trials
From ‘rats in the robing room’ to ‘overworked’ judges and a shortage of court staff, barristers have aired their concerns about the state of the justice system
The use of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) poses ‘significant risks’ across the justice system, public services and government, and current regulation is ‘poorly suited’ to control it, experts have warned
The solicitors’ regulator has paused controversial plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
back-to-top-scroll