header-logo header-logo

Immigrants' group hits out at unfair fee increases

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Fee hikes for settlement applications and required tests for applicants will have a "disproportionate impact" on poor and excluded groups, a campaign group is warning.

As of 2 April 2007, all applicants for indefinite leave to remain need to provide evidence that they have passed either the Life in the UK test or an English for Speakers of Other Languages’ test which includes citizenship materials.

The Home Office says the aim behind the new requirement is to encourage people to learn English and to gain knowledge of UK traditions, structures, laws and democratic processes.

However, the new rules mean the fee for applying for settlement has more than doubled from £335 to £750.

According to the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), the increase in fees will have a “disproportionate impact” on particular racial groups who are among the poorest in UK society, including Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Somalis and Ethiopians.

JCWI spokesperson Rhian Beynon says: “Many of these groups will be unemployed or in low paid and temporary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll