header-logo header-logo

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Immigrants' group hits out at unfair fee increases

Fee hikes for settlement applications and required tests for applicants will have a "disproportionate impact" on poor and excluded groups, a campaign group is warning.

As of 2 April 2007, all applicants for indefinite leave to remain need to provide evidence that they have passed either the Life in the UK test or an English for Speakers of Other Languages’ test which includes citizenship materials.

The Home Office says the aim behind the new requirement is to encourage people to learn English and to gain knowledge of UK traditions, structures, laws and democratic processes.

However, the new rules mean the fee for applying for settlement has more than doubled from £335 to £750.

According to the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), the increase in fees will have a “disproportionate impact” on particular racial groups who are among the poorest in UK society, including Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Somalis and Ethiopians.

JCWI spokesperson Rhian Beynon says: “Many of these groups will be unemployed or in low paid and temporary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll