header-logo header-logo

Immigrants' group hits out at unfair fee increases

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Fee hikes for settlement applications and required tests for applicants will have a "disproportionate impact" on poor and excluded groups, a campaign group is warning.

As of 2 April 2007, all applicants for indefinite leave to remain need to provide evidence that they have passed either the Life in the UK test or an English for Speakers of Other Languages’ test which includes citizenship materials.

The Home Office says the aim behind the new requirement is to encourage people to learn English and to gain knowledge of UK traditions, structures, laws and democratic processes.

However, the new rules mean the fee for applying for settlement has more than doubled from £335 to £750.

According to the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), the increase in fees will have a “disproportionate impact” on particular racial groups who are among the poorest in UK society, including Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Somalis and Ethiopians.

JCWI spokesperson Rhian Beynon says: “Many of these groups will be unemployed or in low paid and temporary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll