header-logo header-logo

13 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Immigration

TR v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2010] EWHC 2055 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 35 (Aug)

The test to be applied when a decision had to be made about whether to extend time under r 10 of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2005 (SI 2005/230) was whether the duty judge of the tribunal was satisfied that, by reason of special circumstances, it would be unjust not to extend time. The tribunal should apply the guidelines set out in BO and others (Extension of time for appealing) (Nigeria) [2006] UKIAT 00035 in considering every extension of time application.

Consequently, any judicial review challenge to an extension of time decision had to consider, as its starting point, the question of whether the guidelines were followed. The guidelines emphasised that any failure or shortcoming of a legal practitioner that had contributed to a delay in appealing had to be considered. Therefore, any practitioner involved in an extension of time application had a duty of candour to the tribunal in providing a full explanation and disclosure of any shortcomings he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll