header-logo header-logo

Immigration

13 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

TR v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2010] EWHC 2055 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 35 (Aug)

The test to be applied when a decision had to be made about whether to extend time under r 10 of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2005 (SI 2005/230) was whether the duty judge of the tribunal was satisfied that, by reason of special circumstances, it would be unjust not to extend time. The tribunal should apply the guidelines set out in BO and others (Extension of time for appealing) (Nigeria) [2006] UKIAT 00035 in considering every extension of time application.

Consequently, any judicial review challenge to an extension of time decision had to consider, as its starting point, the question of whether the guidelines were followed. The guidelines emphasised that any failure or shortcoming of a legal practitioner that had contributed to a delay in appealing had to be considered. Therefore, any practitioner involved in an extension of time application had a duty of candour to the tribunal in providing a full explanation and disclosure of any shortcomings he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll