header-logo header-logo

Immigration

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance officer (Addis Ababa) [2012] EWCA Civ 563, [2012] All ER (D) 06 (May)

On the true construction of the Immigration Rules (HC 251) (the Rules) para 6 and therefore para 309A applied to para 352D. The interpretation plainly set out exhaustively who was to be regarded for the purpose of the Rules as an “adoptive parent” and there was nothing in either para 6 or in para 352D that indicated a contrary intention for the purpose of entry clearance applications under para 352D. That interpretation did not create a lacuna as Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights was open to applicants in appropriate cases. There was no proper basis for saying that there could be some notion of adoption applicable to entry clearance applications under para 352D of the Rules which operated separately from and outside the meaning otherwise given to it for the other purposes of the Rules. The interpretation to be applied under para 6 of the Rules to “adoption” itself expressly brought into play, unless the contrary intention appeared, the requirements of para 309A of the Rules. Although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll