header-logo header-logo

Immigration

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of BB) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission and another [2012] EWCA Civ 1499, [2012] All ER (D) 210 (Nov)

Neither the detention of an individual pending his deportation, nor the grant of conditional bail pending deportation, involved a determination of civil rights within the meaning of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The expulsion of an alien and his detention pending expulsion did not determine his civil rights. At most, they incidentally had an effect on those rights. The distinction was critical in the context of a state’s control over aliens who were within its territory. The fact that the exercise of the power to deport would have an effect on an individual’s right to respect for private and family life or other rights did not mean that the exercise of the power involved a determination of the individual’s civil rights. So too, the fact that the detention of an individual pending deportation would affect him in that way did not mean that the detention involved a determination of civil rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll