header-logo header-logo

Immigration

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Jabarkhail) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1798 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 54 (Jul)

A failure by the secretary of state to comply with her duty to endeavour to trace the family of the claimant when he had applied for asylum at the age of 14 had not rendered the secretary of state’s subsequent decision to refuse his application for asylum unlawful. The general rule was that decision-makers dealing with asylum claims considered them on the basis of the facts and circumstances prevailing at the time of the decision. A decision might be unlawful if it was reached in disregard of a relevant policy. Further, past prejudice suffered in consequence of such an unlawful decision might be a relevant factor to take into account in reaching subsequent decisions, even where the policy had ceased to be applicable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll