header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Jabarkhail) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1798 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 54 (Jul)

A failure by the secretary of state to comply with her duty to endeavour to trace the family of the claimant when he had applied for asylum at the age of 14 had not rendered the secretary of state’s subsequent decision to refuse his application for asylum unlawful. The general rule was that decision-makers dealing with asylum claims considered them on the basis of the facts and circumstances prevailing at the time of the decision. A decision might be unlawful if it was reached in disregard of a relevant policy. Further, past prejudice suffered in consequence of such an unlawful decision might be a relevant factor to take into account in reaching subsequent decisions, even where the policy had ceased to be applicable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll