header-logo header-logo

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of G and another) v Upper Tribunal [2016] EWHC 239 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 117 (Feb)

The Administrative Court allowed the claimant Nigerian nationals’ application for judicial review of the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), refusing permission to appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), dismissing their appeals against deportation decisions by the Secretary of State. The permission refusal had involved a material misunderstanding or misapplication of the law.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll