header-logo header-logo

Immigration—Detention—Minor

18 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49, [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Jul)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson SCJJ, 10 Jul 2013

The Supreme Court, in holding that the defendant home secretary did not act unlawfully when she detained a 17-year-old illegal immigrant in the mistaken but reasonable belief that he was aged over 18, partially disapproved the decision in AAM (a child acting by his litigation friend, FJ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] All ER (D) 175 (Sep).

Stephen Knafler QC & Shu Shin Luh (instructed by South West Law) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC & Susan Chan (instructed by the Treasury solicitor) for the secretary of state.

The appellant was an Afghan national. He arrived in the UK concealed in a lorry. He claimed to be aged 14 and applied for asylum. Local authority social workers carried out an age assessment and concluded that he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll