header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Immigration—Detention—Minor

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
18 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49, [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Jul)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson SCJJ, 10 Jul 2013

The Supreme Court, in holding that the defendant home secretary did not act unlawfully when she detained a 17-year-old illegal immigrant in the mistaken but reasonable belief that he was aged over 18, partially disapproved the decision in AAM (a child acting by his litigation friend, FJ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] All ER (D) 175 (Sep).

Stephen Knafler QC & Shu Shin Luh (instructed by South West Law) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC & Susan Chan (instructed by the Treasury solicitor) for the secretary of state.

The appellant was an Afghan national. He arrived in the UK concealed in a lorry. He claimed to be aged 14 and applied for asylum. Local authority social workers carried out an age assessment and concluded that he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: AI, liberty & the digital cage
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform in limbo
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Enforcement reform gets real
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
NLJ this week: Standish reshapes family & inheritance claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
NLJ this week: Clearing Christine Keeler’s name
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll