header-logo header-logo

18 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Detention—Minor

R (on the application of AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49, [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Jul)

Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger P, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson SCJJ, 10 Jul 2013

The Supreme Court, in holding that the defendant home secretary did not act unlawfully when she detained a 17-year-old illegal immigrant in the mistaken but reasonable belief that he was aged over 18, partially disapproved the decision in AAM (a child acting by his litigation friend, FJ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] All ER (D) 175 (Sep).

Stephen Knafler QC & Shu Shin Luh (instructed by South West Law) for the appellant. Robin Tam QC & Susan Chan (instructed by the Treasury solicitor) for the secretary of state.

The appellant was an Afghan national. He arrived in the UK concealed in a lorry. He claimed to be aged 14 and applied for asylum. Local authority social workers carried out an age assessment and concluded that he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll