header-logo header-logo

22 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration Rules overhaul

The Law Commission has proposed a major refit of the UK’s Immigration Rules, which it says are complicated and difficult to follow.

The overhaul would not affect any substantive policy but would focus on how the Rules are drafted and presented: for example, removing unnecessary repetition, providing a less confusing structure and using clearer language. It asks for views, in a consultation launched this week, on making the Rules less prescriptive by creating shorter, more general Rules supported by guidance that is illustrative only in order to give more discretion to caseworkers.

Since 1973, the Rules have grown from 40 pages to about 1,100 pages. Their complexity, the Commission says, adversely affects not only applicants themselves but also Home Office caseworkers who must put them into practice.

Law Commissioner for Public Law, Nicholas Paines QC, said: ‘As the Immigration Rules have become longer, more detailed and more specific, they’ve also become more complicated and harder to follow for applicants.

‘The Home Office has asked us to help put things right. Our proposals would introduce clearer language, and improve the presentation of the Rules so they’re easier to understand and follow.’

According to the Law Commission, one problem is that the Home Office has pursued a policy of making the Rules more prescriptive and therefore more transparent in recent years. Unfortunately, however, this has made the Rules longer, more complicated and harder to follow. Consequently, applicants may find it necessary to seek expensive legal advice in order to navigate the system.

Its proposals include taking a uniform, standardised approach to the wording, headings, definitions and section numbering; removing overlapping provisions; and investigating whether adding hyperlinks, signposting and interactive tools could help applicants.

The consultation, Simplifying the Immigration Rules, closes on 26 April.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll