header-logo header-logo

22 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration Rules overhaul

The Law Commission has proposed a major refit of the UK’s Immigration Rules, which it says are complicated and difficult to follow.

The overhaul would not affect any substantive policy but would focus on how the Rules are drafted and presented: for example, removing unnecessary repetition, providing a less confusing structure and using clearer language. It asks for views, in a consultation launched this week, on making the Rules less prescriptive by creating shorter, more general Rules supported by guidance that is illustrative only in order to give more discretion to caseworkers.

Since 1973, the Rules have grown from 40 pages to about 1,100 pages. Their complexity, the Commission says, adversely affects not only applicants themselves but also Home Office caseworkers who must put them into practice.

Law Commissioner for Public Law, Nicholas Paines QC, said: ‘As the Immigration Rules have become longer, more detailed and more specific, they’ve also become more complicated and harder to follow for applicants.

‘The Home Office has asked us to help put things right. Our proposals would introduce clearer language, and improve the presentation of the Rules so they’re easier to understand and follow.’

According to the Law Commission, one problem is that the Home Office has pursued a policy of making the Rules more prescriptive and therefore more transparent in recent years. Unfortunately, however, this has made the Rules longer, more complicated and harder to follow. Consequently, applicants may find it necessary to seek expensive legal advice in order to navigate the system.

Its proposals include taking a uniform, standardised approach to the wording, headings, definitions and section numbering; removing overlapping provisions; and investigating whether adding hyperlinks, signposting and interactive tools could help applicants.

The consultation, Simplifying the Immigration Rules, closes on 26 April.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll