header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008 / John Linneker , Huw Morris
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Media , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

An impossible task?

How feasible is it for internet service providers to police the internet? John Linneker and Huw Morris investigate

 

 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently commented that internet service providers (ISPs) should be held accountable for illegal downloading and file-sharing, since it would be absurd to send millions of infringers to prison. But is the system truly enforceable?

There has been much coverage in the press about a government proposal to force ISPs to monitor their customers to tackle illegal downloading. A recent paper from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport warns that to protect the creative industries in the digital age, ISPs and rights holders should work together to combat copyright infringement. Failure to reach a mutual regulatory agreement would result in the government implementing legislation in 2009. An agreement between ISPs, media companies and industry bodies was introduced in in November 2007. While it has been applauded by music and film industries around the world, its success has yet to be seen.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll