header-logo header-logo

An impossible task?

24 April 2008 / John Linneker , Huw Morris
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Media , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

How feasible is it for internet service providers to police the internet? John Linneker and Huw Morris investigate

 

 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently commented that internet service providers (ISPs) should be held accountable for illegal downloading and file-sharing, since it would be absurd to send millions of infringers to prison. But is the system truly enforceable?

There has been much coverage in the press about a government proposal to force ISPs to monitor their customers to tackle illegal downloading. A recent paper from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport warns that to protect the creative industries in the digital age, ISPs and rights holders should work together to combat copyright infringement. Failure to reach a mutual regulatory agreement would result in the government implementing legislation in 2009. An agreement between ISPs, media companies and industry bodies was introduced in in November 2007. While it has been applauded by music and film industries around the world, its success has yet to be seen.

 

Scale Of The Problem

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll