header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008 / John Linneker , Huw Morris
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Media , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

An impossible task?

How feasible is it for internet service providers to police the internet? John Linneker and Huw Morris investigate

 

 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently commented that internet service providers (ISPs) should be held accountable for illegal downloading and file-sharing, since it would be absurd to send millions of infringers to prison. But is the system truly enforceable?

There has been much coverage in the press about a government proposal to force ISPs to monitor their customers to tackle illegal downloading. A recent paper from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport warns that to protect the creative industries in the digital age, ISPs and rights holders should work together to combat copyright infringement. Failure to reach a mutual regulatory agreement would result in the government implementing legislation in 2009. An agreement between ISPs, media companies and industry bodies was introduced in in November 2007. While it has been applauded by music and film industries around the world, its success has yet to be seen.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll