header-logo header-logo

An impossible task?

24 April 2008 / John Linneker , Huw Morris
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Media , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

How feasible is it for internet service providers to police the internet? John Linneker and Huw Morris investigate

 

 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently commented that internet service providers (ISPs) should be held accountable for illegal downloading and file-sharing, since it would be absurd to send millions of infringers to prison. But is the system truly enforceable?

There has been much coverage in the press about a government proposal to force ISPs to monitor their customers to tackle illegal downloading. A recent paper from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport warns that to protect the creative industries in the digital age, ISPs and rights holders should work together to combat copyright infringement. Failure to reach a mutual regulatory agreement would result in the government implementing legislation in 2009. An agreement between ISPs, media companies and industry bodies was introduced in in November 2007. While it has been applauded by music and film industries around the world, its success has yet to be seen.

 

Scale Of The Problem

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll