header-logo header-logo

In hot water?

224735
Aneurin Brewer sets out a practical guide to defending the pilots of small boats following the Nationality and Borders Act 2022
  • This article seeks to address, from a defence practitioner’s perspective, practical approaches to the prosecution of pilots of small boats following the amendments to ss 24 and 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 made by ss 40 and 41 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022.

As migrant crossings of the British Channel in so-called ‘small boats’ rose in political salience in and around 2018, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) started to attempt to prosecute the pilots of these craft. These pilots are usually asylum seekers themselves who have been pressganged or induced into holding the tiller in return for reduced fares. Nevertheless, these defendants were charged and routinely convicted of offences of facilitating their passengers’ alleged breaches of immigration law, contrary to s 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 (IA 1971), an offence primarily intended for the prosecution of people smugglers.

In R v Kakaei [2021] EWCA

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll