header-logo header-logo

Income drop for barristers

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Average takings drop 12% as profession feels pain of cuts

Barristers’ average income has fallen 12% in the last two years—from £123,000 to £108,000.

The figures, gathered by finance provider LDF, mean many may struggle to meet their 31 July bill deadline. The July bill is a payment on account for self-employed persons, usually equal to half of the previous year’s tax bill.

The average income may seem very generous indeed to many barristers. Junior criminal counsel, in particular, have been hard hit by cuts to legal aid fees. A 30% reduction in fees for Very High Cost Cases has led to a boycott by criminal barristers, which resulted in the high-profile stay of a multi-defendant fraud trial at Southwark Crown Court last month (R v Crawley). The case has since been ordered to continue.

Junior counsel in criminal cases often earn less than £28,000—sometimes as low as £14,000—once costs such as chambers rent are deducted.

According to LDF, a 19% rise in new entrants to the profession—by an extra 2,000 to 13,000 in the two years leading up to 2011/2012—has contributed to a decrease in workload. A combination of fixed fees for immigration, asylum and other areas of legally aided work, and the removal of legal aid completely from large swathes of civil work, has added to barristers’ woes.

Peter Alderson, LDF managing director, says: “As well as the cuts to legal aid meaning there is less work available for barristers, the Legal Aid Board is notoriously slow to pay them for their work, a big problem for barristers relying on quick payment to cover their bills. Late paying clients are also proving a real problem for barristers, which means a barrister’s cash-flow can hit extreme peaks and troughs throughout the year—if a tax bill hits during a trough, many barristers could find their backs against a wall.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll