header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Apollo Fuels Ltd and others [2016] EWCA Civ 157, [2016] All ER (D) 170 (Mar)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ appeal concerning whether an employee was liable to income tax in respect of a car leased to him by his employer on arm’s length commercial terms, including lease charges at full market value. The tribunals had been right to have decided that a charge to income tax arose under Ch 6 of Pt 3 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 only if the terms on which a car was leased to an employee conferred a benefit on the employee in the ordinary sense of that word, and the employees in the present case had received no such benefit.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll