header-logo header-logo

28 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Six Continents Ltd and another company v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another [2016] EWHC 2426 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 114 (Oct)

Among other things, the Chancery Division held, upon the agreed basis that most of the dividends paid to the UK-resident second claimant company (Six Continents) by its wholly-owned Dutch-resident subsidiary (SCIH) had been unlawfully charged UK corporation tax, had entitled Six Continents to a credit at the Dutch standard rate of corporation tax for so much of the dividends as had been derived from the “revaluation adjustments” and which had arisen from the liquidation of a subsidiary of SCIH. In those circumstances, Six Continents was entitled to unlawful tax of £7,104,450 paid to the defendants, the Inland Revenue Commissioners and the Revenue and Customs Commissioners.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll