header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Tager v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] UKUT 40 (TCC), [2015] All ER (D) 249 (Mar)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) allowed the applications by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners pursuant to para 50 of Sch 36 to the Finance Act 2008 for imposition of a penalty on a taxpayer for failure to comply with information notices issued by the Revenue. The tribunal decided that the penalty under that provision would be nearly 100% of the income tax due and 100% of the inheritance tax due.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
back-to-top-scroll