header-logo header-logo

Incompetent barristers to face sin bin panel

13 April 2007
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barristers who are not up to scratch on the advocacy front in court will be referred by judges and colleagues to a remedial panel which will provide tips on how they can improve their performance, under measures outlined by the Bar Council.

The proposals, which are being sent out for consultation, also include plans for grading barristers who do legal aid work according to proficiency and experience. The Bar Standards Board will also review existing quality assurance procedures.

Geoffrey Vos QC, the Bar chairman, says the new panel, to be known as the Bar Quality Assurance Panel, will not be regulatory. “It will not make formal complaints. It will advise a barrister how to improve, whether by taking advocacy training or by other means,” he says.

He adds that improving quality controls should not be seen as a threat to the Bar’s independence but as a necessary part of growing up.

“We are a big profession now, attracting entrants from all backgrounds. We must be able to produce evidence for our

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll